Principals named for Seneca Valley cyber program
Seneca Valley school directors recently promoted Denise Manganello to principal and hired Tony Conti as assistant principal for the district's Academy of Choice, otherwise known as its cyber program.
The program offers students from Seneca Valley and 26 partnering school districts the opportunity to take online classes full time, part time, or as a supplement to traditional full-time classes. The cyber program is available to all grade levels, K-12.
Manganello, a Seneca Valley graduate, has been the program's assistant principal since its inception in 2007, but a growing staff and enrollment prompted the school board to create the position of principal for her.
Manganello said she will have a staff of about 40 teachers in the fall. She also said the cyber program had more than 3,200 students from Seneca Valley and partnering school districts enroll in at least one class in the last school year. Only 40 students enrolled in the program's inaugural year six years ago.
“I think this is great for this program, because we've grown so much and now we have a full staff,” Manganello said.
Conti, also a Seneca Valley graduate, returns to the school district after working as the assistant principal at Westwood High School in Florida, which also offers a cyber program for its students.
“It's been really surreal since I've been back the last two weeks, and the great reality is that Seneca Valley is a highly respected school district and it is great to be back,” Conti said.
The school board also named Jeffrey Roberts, former assistant principal of the cyber program, as the assistant principal of the senior high school. Roberts succeeds Jodie Perry, who became principal of the intermediate high school following Alan Cumo's retirement.
Shawn Annarelli is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.