Council considers park improvements
By Tom McGee
Published: Wednesday, Oct. 10, 2012, 9:01 p.m.
Improvements could be coming to the park area above the baseball fields in Aspinwall.
Councilman Jim Donahoe said he met with members of the Aspinwall Neighborhood Watch and they will create a wish list for improvements.
The group raised money at its National Night Out event for park improvements.
Donahoe said they have between $4,500 and $5,000 to spend.
Replacing the lights is a possibility.
“They've been there a long time,” Donahoe said. “It's not like they were defective it's just that they're old and need replaced.”
Allegheny Together part-icipants plan to meet on the third Monday of each month through December at 6 p.m. at the borough building.
The program is an economic development program in which Aspinwall was accepted into earlier this year.
The borough offices are at 217 Commercial Ave.
The borough parking lot on Freeport Road is scheduled to be paved on Oct. 29.
Councilman Joe Giuffre said the lot will be open in time for Halloween events in the borough.
A planting day in the borough is set for Nov. 10 at 8 a.m.
The event is part of a TreeVitalize grant that will plant 24 new trees in the borough. Councilman Joe Noro said the exact location for the trees has not been decided.
The day will include a picnic after the trees are planted and educational talks on tree care.
Aspinwall scarves are available for $10 at the borough building and will be on sale at Fall in the Wall on Saturday.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Kovacevic: Still waiting on Crosby, Malkin
- Rossi: Lack of together time showing for Penguins’ defense
- 3 ejected after Pirates, Brewers brawl
- Washington County crash causes chemical spill into Chartiers Creek
- Fleury a bright spot among struggling Penguins in playoffs
- Police fatally shoot man in Wilkinsburg after chase
- Starkey: Penguins’ arrogance astounding
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Draftees’ longevity key for NFL success
- Attorney wants lesser term for woman in Greensburg torture death
- LaBar: Did WWE referee know finish to Undertaker match?