FiOS could arrive in Aspinwall
Aspinwall residents soon could have another choice for cable service.
Officials are finalizing a cable franchise agreement with Verizon to bring the company's FiOS service to the borough.
The service would be available for about 90 percent of residents in the community.
Verizon officials said they could not commit to eventually reaching the rest of the community, and they did not want to commit to an agreement that would require them to provide service to 100 percent of the borough residents.
“At this point, we're not making any commitment to that,” Bill Carnahan, vice president of external affairs for Verizon, said.
Carnahan said Aspinwall was approached about an agreement because technology to provide the cable service is available.
“We already had the investment in the Sharpsburg wire center, so, therefore, we can service a lot of the customers and meet that demand and create cable competition,” Carnahan said.
Two of the areas not being served are the River Oaks complex and a development on the site of a former high school.
Any agreement with Verizon would not affect the borough's existing cable franchise agreement with Comcast.
Council President Mark Ellermeyer said borough officials did attempt to get complete coverage of the borough into the agreement.
Even though that was not possible, officials wanted to provide the service from Verizon to as much of the town as possible, he said.
“There are folks here who would benefit from having the service and I think even those of us on Comcast would benefit from the competition,” Ellermeyer said.
Council and Verizon officials are finalizing the agreement. If it is approved, Verizon representatives said, the service should be available quickly.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.