Officials seek ways to make Aspinwall parking lot safer
Aspinwall officials will make parking for people with disabilities free at its main parking lot while they determine how to make the lot safer.
Cornelia Harlovic addressed council last week after her mother fell while putting money in the meter at a spot for people with disabilities.
Meters are on a curb, a step up from the lot.
Harlovic said her mother will be OK, and her main worry is about safety for people who frequently use the parking lot for the neighboring medical building, stores and restaurants in the area.
She said others have fallen in the same area.
“My concern was really about constituents here and everyone who uses this area,” Harlovic said.
She suggested that the meters for those spots be removed or moved forward and placed on the lot. She said she worried that someone could be seriously hurt.
“There's a tragedy waiting to happen,” Harlovic said.
Councilman Joe Giuffre acknowledged that there have been problems.
“That's something that needs to be looked at,” Giuffre said.
Councilman Joe Noro suggested having a safety professional from the borough's insurance carrier come in and study the area.
They could then make recommendations for improvements.
“We pay for the service; we might as well have the safety professional come in,” Noro said.
Once that review is completed, officials can decide what further action to take to improve safety.
Until that is done, meters on the spots will be bagged. Fines for illegally parking in the spots will still be enforced.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.