ShareThis Page

Cost of removing garbage to shrink for O'Hara resident

Tawnya Panizzi
| Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2012, 8:57 p.m.

O'Hara council found treasure in its new trash contract.

Homeowners each will save about $24 per year, a township-wide total of about $100,000 annually, with a new four-year contract signed last week, township Manager Julie Jakubec said.

The agreement is with current hauler Waste Management and was reached with help through the North Hills Council of Governments.

“They are able to do some automated services this time,” Jakubec said. “When that happens, it can cut down on costs.”

Residents will see immediate savings on their bills.

The cost per month will be $16.05 in the first year of the contract, compared to a current rate of $18.37 per month.

Rates will climb over the four-year contract to $17.23 per month.

There is an option to extend the deal for a fifth year.

In addition to the cost savings, Jakubec said, a bonus of the new contract is the expanded recycling program.

“They're going to supply 65-gallon containers to everyone,” she said.

“They're huge.

“They fit much more than the small ones out there now. I think it should encourage more recycling.”

Corrugated cardboard will be accepted in the new program, along with items such as glass, plastic and newspaper.

The township's trash contract will continue to provide curbside collection of yard waste one day each month from May to September.

Public works contract reached

Council and the township's public works department have agreed on a new four-year contract.

The package is “pretty standard,” Jakubec said.

It includes a 3-percent wage increase for the road-crew employees as well as a “bump in their uniform allowance.”

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.