Street light answer to request for safety
New lights were recently installed in front of the Middle Road Park.
Photo by Jan Pakler | for The Herald
In an effort to boost traffic safety, Indiana Township Supervisors have approved the addition of a street light along Red Maple Lane.
The decision comes after several requests by residents, many of whom said they were worried about the extra traffic created by the newly built Middle Road fire hall on the adjacent street.
“The entrance to the new fire hall allows the firetrucks to enter on Red Maple so they don't have to stop on Middle Road and tie up traffic,” Manager Dan Anderson said.
Red Maple Lane is used to access Middle Road Park, a 40-acre site with five athletic fields.
It is a popular spot from spring to fall with youth sports.
Anderson said the existing traffic, combined with the addition of the firetrucks along the road, had some residents asking for increased safety measures.
Police Chief Bob Wilson reviewed the site and recommended the installation of the extra street light.
Anderson said he talked with Duquesne Light about the addition of a high-pressure 100-watt street light for that intersection.
It will cost the township about $17 a month.
In other news
Supervisor Jeff Peck said he has received complaints about abandoned properties in the Indianola section of the township.
Anderson said there are four homes with property-maintenance issues.
He said the information will be reviewed by code enforcement officer Jeff Curti, who will notify the owners and give them an opportunity to fix the violations before a citation is issued.
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.