Fox Chapel OK's budget; tax rate to come
Fox Chapel Council last week approved its 2013 budget but residents will have to wait for the millage rate.
“The amount we expect to receive in real estate tax was determined and once the assessed values are set with all the appeals, we will set the millage rate,” Manager Gary Koehler said.
The borough's total budget is $8.8 million.
If the tax rate remains steady at last year's 2.4 mils, the owner of a home assessed at $200,000 will again pay $480 in property taxes.
“We are halfway through the process,” Koehler said.
Council approved the borough's proposed 2013 budget back in November but delayed a final vote because of the uncertainty of Allegheny County assessments, Koehler said.
“We want to put those numbers in the budget and set the tax rate accordingly,” he said.
“Closer to the time of the tax bills, we will set the millage.”
Council is expecting the rates to remain fairly level with 2012. Any increase would be instituted only to cover the cost of assessment appeals.
In other business:
•Council approved a $5,000 donation to Volunteers of America of PA's All of Us Care, the Sharpsburg-based organization that helps link people with jobs and children with safe after-school activities.
•Council approved the following appointments to borough committees: Nanette Bennett and Walter Scott to the environmental advisory council, John Montgomery to the zoning hearing board and Susan Tusick and Daniel Sliger to the construction board of appeals.
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or at email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.