O'Hara man accused of assaulting police officer, EMS workers
Sharpsburg police accuse a man they tried to assist of assaulting three EMS officers and a police officer.
Daniel A. Mellinger, 33, of Kittanning Pike in O'Hara Township, was charged with aggravated assault, disorderly conduct, recklessly endangering another person and resisting arrest after an incident at CoGo's on North Canal Street in Sharpsburg.
Police said crews were dispatched to the store's parking lot on Feb. 2 after Mellinger fell.
When a member of the Seneca EMS crew began to help him, police accuse Mellinger of becoming violent.
Mellinger is also accused of trying to headbutt a crew member.
According to the criminal complaint, he tried to strike a Sharpsburg police officer and members of the EMS crew.
When he was handcuffed and placed on a stretcher and into an ambulance, police accuse him of kicking a member of the EMS crew. During an attempt to prevent him from harming other crew members, Mellinger is accused of breaking the thumb of a Sharpsburg police officer. He was treated at UPMC-St. Margaret hospital near Aspinwall.
Mellinger admitted to using heroin and Xanax that day, according to the police report.
Bond was set for $30,000. A preliminary hearing was set for Wednesday at District Judge Elissa Lang's court.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.