Plan calls for trees to beautify area near Sharpsburg business district
Plans are underway to beautify a small open space near the entrance of the Sharpsburg business district.
The land, known as the South Bend Pocket Park, is located near H.R. Curry Co. Inc.
Part of the beautification project could come from a TreeVitalize grant borough officials plan to apply for.
The program provides trees for local communities. Sharpsburg could receive about 20 trees through the program. Aspinwall and Indiana Township also have participated.
Borough secretary Jan Barbus said the borough's plans for the park space depended on whether it pursued the grant.
Before the borough can qualify for the grant, a member of council and two public works employees would have to take a course on tree tending.
“Whoever signs the original application, they will have to take a class in learning how to take care of trees,” Barbus said.
Several other locations in the borough are targeted for trees but permission to plant trees there is still needed.
The grant application is due by March 15.
Borough officials also are in need of a local landscaper to perform work at the park. Councilman Matthew Rudzki said officials can not wait long to find someone.
“Planting season will be upon us very soon,” Rudzki said.
The park will serve as an entryway into the borough business district, Councilman Lou DeLuca said.
“It's an aesthetic entrance park, it's not a park for individuals,” DeLuca said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.