Blawnox wraps up water tower demolition project
Blawnox officials have closed the book on a water-tower demolition project on Carla Drive.
Council voted unanimously to approve two agreements for poles on Carla Drive. Sprint had an antenna on the now- removed water tower, which needed to be replaced.
One agreement, with Sprint, is for a temporary pole in the ground. Another is with SBA Towers IV for a permanent tower.
Solicitor Jack Cambest said he was satisfied with the agreement. The only issue that could come up in the future is the possibility of SBA Towers IV leasing more land for its tower, depending on where the tower is placed.
“If they do that, we'll have to amend the land lease at that point in time,” Cambest said.
The temporary pole already is in place because the land was leased through May 1, Cambest said. The new agreements will go forward from that date.
Council also approved a payment of $16,800 to Kosinski Demolition of Port Austin, Mich. Borough engineer Gordon Taylor of Senate Engineering said the project has been completed.
“It's down and done,” Taylor said.
He said workers will return to the water tower's site for reseeding of the ground as soon as they can.
“They'll come as soon as the weather breaks,” Taylor said.
The project was funded through a Community Development Block Grant. The tower long had been an eyesore on Carla Drive. A contract for removing the structure was approved in October, and work was completed last month.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.