Sharpsburg wants to know who's responsible for Freeport Road bridge path
It appears that a sidewalk along the Freeport Road bridge — the span between Sharpsburg and Aspinwall — is within Sharpsburg's borders, but officials want more information before deciding whether the borough has to maintain the walkway.
Officials had a discussion on whether the borough should be maintaining the sidewalk late last month.
Councilman Lou DeLuca said officials first needed to determine in which community the walkway is located.
PennDOT plans to replace the bridge.
“The point that I'm trying to look at here is what township, borough municipality is the bridge in, even though it's owned by PennDOT,” DeLuca said.
Maps appear to show that the bridge is in O'Hara, while the sidewalk is in Sharpsburg.
No matter what community the sidewalk is in, it makes sense for Sharpsburg to maintain it, Councilwoman Karen Pastor said.
“Our people, Sharpsburg people, walk up and down that,” Pastor said.
Council President Renee Procopio said it could be beneficial for Sharpsburg to take over maintenance.
“If they're going to fix it, and all we have to do is upkeep it, why not? How much time is this little piece going to cost us?” Procopio asked.
DeLuca said PennDOT officials have indicated that because the sidewalk would be in place only for the benefit of the borough, Sharpsburg should be responsible for maintaining it.
In the past, the borough has not maintained the sidewalk because it was unclear whether it was in Sharpsburg.
Procopio said communication is needed with PennDOT on the sidewalk issue.
PennDOT officials have told local leaders a temporary walkway won't be in place during construction.
That would be an issue for the borough because residents regularly use the walkway, Procopio said.
The borough plans to contact state officials for their opinion about what should be done before taking action.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.