Aspinwall continues participation in solar energy program
Aspinwall plans to continue participating in the SunShot program.
The cost is $2,400, equal to about 60 hours of staff time, for phase two of the program.
The program encourages the use of solar energy. Municipalities that participate are in the process of updating their zoning regulations to include solar panel installations.
The borough's planning commission has completed its review of the proposal. The plan now has to be reviewed by Allegheny County and can then come back to Aspinwall Council, solicitor Steve Korbel said.
The proposal also will have to be the subject of a public hearing.
“This is something we probably couldn't consider until May or June at the earliest,” Korbel said.
Though there have not been many requests to install solar panels in Aspinwall, the proposal will establish universal guidelines that can be used if those requests are made, Councilman Joseph Warren said.
“If at any point in the future somebody wants to install anything, there are set guidelines,” Warren said.
The SunShot program is being overseen by PennFuture, a nonprofit based in Harrisburg. PennFuture is currently seeking funding from the U.S. Department of Energy to continue the program.
The first phase of the program included initial work on the zoning ordinance and various programs and seminars.
Aspinwall officials updated the borough's fee list to include a $250 filing fee for solar unit installation last week. The money will cover the zoning review process.
By contributing to the Sunshot Initiative, the borough can be reimbursed for money it spends on anything related to the solar panel guidelines.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.