Budget includes several Aspinwall donations
Aspinwall officials have divided up its annual donations to local nonprofit groups.
The 2013 budget included $10,000 for local organizations, the same as the 2012 budget. This year, the Cooper-Siegel Community Library in Fox Chapel will receive the most money with a $4,000 donation. The library also has a branch in Sharpsburg.
Foxwall EMS service will receive $2,000 in funds. The company serves Aspinwall and neighboring communities. The Aspinwall Civic Association and Riverfront Park will each receive $1,000.
The borough opted to include two new groups in its donations. All of Us Care will receive $1,000 and Free Rides for Seniors will receive $500.
Councilman Kevin Gordon said All of Us Care has regularly requested assistance from the borough.
“They've been around a long time,” Gordon said.
The Sharpsburg-based organization works to prevent crime and substance abuse among children. Gordon said the Pittsburgh North Optimists Club, which has done work for the Aspinwall area in the past, have supported the group.
“They're strong supporters of All of Us Care,” Gordon said.
Free Rides for Seniors offers transportation for residents in the Aspinwall area who are 60 and older along Freeport Road. The service is based in O'Hara.
The borough will not use the fund for community events, including the annual trick or treat night, but funding for that is available in the budget, Gordon said.
The remaining $500 in the account will be saved for flowers for funeral arrangements if needed, Gordon said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.