Aspinwall baseball, softball could get boost
By Tom McGee
Published: Wednesday, April 10, 2013, 9:01 p.m.
Aspinwall Borough officials are considering a donation to bolster the Aspinwall baseball and softball program this year.
The Aspinwall Baseball and Softball organization, a volunteer group that provides baseball activities for local children, is in need of financial help, volunteers said.
The group typically has not had to raise money in the past.
Registration costs between $75 and $95 per player.
Councilman Jim Donahoe said it's possible the borough could contribute funds this year.
A fundraiser took place last weekend. Once donations from that event are added up, council can decide how to help.
Organizers have said they hope to raise about $8,000.
“We'll discuss it and see what we can come up with,” Donahoe said.
A former member of the program, Susan Sundo, is accused of misusing a debit card to charge more than $4,800.
She was charged with theft late last month and faces a preliminary hearing on that charge in June. She operated the group's concession stand.
The group also has to purchase some new equipment to meet new safety regulations.
Aspinwall's annual Green Streets Clean Up Day will be April 20 from 10 a.m. to noon. Work will begin on Brilliant Avenue.
All ages are invited to help clean up the borough.
The next Aspinwall council meeting is scheduled for May 1 at 7 p.m. at the borough building on Commercial Ave.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Obama losing close adviser to end 9 years of service
- Analysis: Kesler remains on Penguins’ radar as Shero looks bring back ‘Big 3’ formula
- Starkey: Steelers know when to say goodbye
- Pirates’ big risk with pitch-heavy draft focus might soon pay off
- With so many needs, Steelers can ill afford to miss in draft
- Ex-Colts executive Polian: Approach free agency with caution
- Ukrainians steel to resist Russian aggression
- Greensburg bishop’s time at helm draws to a close
- Paulk: Dixon eyes Indy 500, Coca-Cola 600 double
- Stats Corner: McCutchen’s contract extension brings huge cost savings
- Steelers defense doesn’t make the grade in 2013 review