Grants could fund future projects in Blawnox
Blawnox officials are in the early stages of discussing future projects that could benefit from Community Development Block Grant funding.
Next year, Blawnox will be eligible to receive county funding through the program. Pre-applications are due May 24, and full applications are due by July 22.
Borough engineer Gordon Taylor of Senate Engineering said now is the time to start thinking about how that money could be used.
“You should start thinking about some of the pre-applications you want to prepare,” Taylor said.
Borough manager Sherry Kordas said about $20,000 should be available for the borough, That is down from $25,000 that previously was available.
“They decreased it because of reduced funding,” Kordas said.
To receive funding, officials must have a project to submit. The community is eligible to receive funding every other year. Money from applications submitted this summer would be received in 2014.
“Next year is our year to get that $20,000,” Kordas said.
Kordas said officials have ideas for some projects but are open to others. They would need to be cost out in order to be included in the application, she said.
“If there are paving projects, we need to identify those,” Kordas said.
The borough has had success with block-grant funding in the past.
A water tower on Carla Drive was demolished with funds from the program.
The program also has funded upgrades to the lights at the ball field.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.