Aspinwall paving plan in works
Before Councilman Joe Giuffre leaves his post at the end of the year, he hopes to have a plan outlined for road work in Aspinwall.
Giuffre, who is not seeking re-election to council but is running uncontested for the Democratic mayoral nomination, said he and public-works foreman Lee Albacker recently toured the borough to see what streets need paving and brick work.
He said he plans to finalize that list and hopes to setup a plan to have the work completed in the next few years.
“I'd like to at least have the next three to five years identified,” Giuffre said.
The list would go to the borough engineer so the borough can have a cost estimate. Money from tax revenue could be dedicated to road work, he said.
“Maybe we'd have to do a half a mill for the next two years or something and go into a special account,” Giuffre said.
He said he has researched grant money for paving, but funding is difficult to find.
“For paving, there's not much out there,” Giuffre said.
A study done by students from Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh as part of the Allegheny Together program looked at various parts of the community, including roads and signs, Councilman Joe Warren said. That work could be used to help plan a paving program.
“Some of the work overlaps with what their study is,” Warren said.
Borough workers could replace some small areas of bricks, as they did last year, Giuffre said. But there is not much of that kind of work to be done.
“There's not too many small areas,” Giuffre said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.