Making Freeport Road safer one project suggested for Aspinwall
Council President Mark Ellermeyer wants his fellow officials to start considering at least three long-term projects for Aspinwall.
One is looking at the way the part of Freeport Road that passes through Aspinwall is handled. He noted that the part of the road that goes through Sharpsburg is named Main Street, has a lower speed limit and offers more parking spaces.
“I'd like us to consider pursuing a change in the way PennDOT administers Freeport Road through Aspinwall,” Ellermeyer said.
With the Aspinwall Riverfront Park coming and a new intersection proposed at Brilliant Avenue to serve as an entrance to the park, lowering the speed limit would be an attempt to make the road safer.
Ellermeyer also said he wants Aspinwall to work with Allegheny County on maintaining Delafield Road.
There is an entrance ramp to Route 28 off the road, which also is the main access to the VA Hospital. That leads to heavy car and bus traffic.
“It's not going to get into better shape on its own,” Ellermeyer said.
A sound wall for the portion of Route 28 that is near Aspinwall homes also should be discussed, Ellermeyer said. The wall could limit noise from the highway and also protect homes from debris from the road. The issue has been discussed before.
Within the next few months, Ellermeyer said he would like council to start discussing those projects. He said it likely will require work from council before any decisions are made.
“I think these are things that are going to take time,” Ellermeyer said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.