CMU students study offers ways to improve Aspinwall
Three Carnegie Mellon University students will present a written report to Aspinwall officials on ideas for improving the borough's business district.
The students presented a summary of their findings last week. They focused on three areas — Alley A connecting Brilliant and Commercial avenues, a way-finding system and a business-directory sign.
Under the proposal presented, Alley A would be spruced up to better connect the two business districts on Commercial and Brilliant. Parking would remain, and space for pedestrians and bikers would be designated.
Councilman Joseph Warren said the alley still would be open to cars and trucks that use it on a regular basis.
“It'll still be accessible by traffic,” Warren said.
Signs would guide walkers to different parts of Aspinwall and neighboring communities.
A business directory, similar to a mall-directory sign, would highlight what types of businesses are in the borough, said Geoffrey Snow, one of the students who did the study.
The directory would “give an idea of what's there, what businesses exist and hopefully spark interest and raise traffic to the businesses,” Snow said.
The signs could direct visitors to Aspinwall's business district, the Aspinwall Riverfront Park that is under development, Squaw Valley Park and other landmarks.
Council President Mark Ellermeyer said the Fox Chapel District Association, an organization that works to beautify the region, could get involved to get that sign system going.
“I think that could have more of an impact than coming from Aspinwall,” Ellermeyer said.
Warren thanked the students for their work.
The study was part of the university's “Sustainable Communities Course.” Aspinwall was able to take part because of its participation in Allegheny Together, an economic-development program run through Allegheny County.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.