Aspinwall seeks to shed light on park
Aspinwall officials are hoping to shed some light on the dark spots at the community park.
Council members are taking steps to install a new set of lights at the park.
Councilman Jim Donahoe said when he looked at the lighting with members of the community, including representatives from public works and the police department, he was surprised at how many of the lights don't work.
The initial estimate for new lights is $5,625.
“What we're looking at is pretty extensive,” Donahoe said.
Officials plan to check other prices before finalizing a contract.
The usage cost of the lights is not known because it is not known how often the lights will be on, Donahoe said.
The new lights would use the same poles as the lights that are now at the park.
The Aspinwall Neighborhood Watch group has announced plans to upgrade the park including new playground equipment and improvements at the pavilion.
Those plans make improved lighting even more important, Donahoe said.
“I'd like to get this done for the summer, quickly,” Donahoe said.
Police were asked to participate in the process to better understand what areas they can't see when on patrol.
Lee Albacker, public works foreman, said there has been graffiti and vandalism at the park.
“They paint graffiti all over the cement block,” Albacker said.
Though the lights are unlikely to eliminate all vandalism, Donahoe said, better lighting could improve the situation.
“It makes it less inviting,” Donahoe said.
“What is proposed here is very much needed,” Donahoe said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.