Sprindgale Legion remains hot
It was a good week for the Springdale American Legion baseball team as Manager Frank Sweeney's squad remained hot with three wins.
After getting rained out against Shaler on June 16, Springdale hosted Monroeville on June 17 and came away with a 2-1 win in 10 innings.
“It was a good pitcher's duel,” Sweeney said. “Andy Marsh pitched six strong innings for us and then C.J. Smith came in and gave us four shutout innings.”
Springdale won the game when Parker Bennett came home on a wild pitch.
Taylor Huber scored the first Springdale run.
Springdale traveled to Monroeville on Thursday and Sweeney's team made sure this wouldn't be a pitchers duel as they scored early and often en route to a 17-2 rout.
Joe Palumbo went five for five and winning pitcher James Serio added three hits.
Springdale ended the week with a big win over Shaler on Friday by a 5-4 score.
“That game kept going back and fourth,” Sweeney said. “That was a nice win for us.”
Smith got the win. Palumbo led off the last of the seventh with a triple and Serio banged a single to end the game. Serio also doubled, along with Camden Kelly.
Springdale is now 6-1 in the division and 8-2 overall.
“We've been playing pretty good ball,” Sweeney said.
“Right now, we have to keep pace with Penn Hills. They only have one loss. Every game with them will be a big one.”
Marty Stewart is a sports editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-782-2123 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.