Sharpsburg crews to clean site of demolished home
By Tom McGee
Published: Wednesday, June 26, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Members of the Sharpsburg public-works department will clean up the site of a demolished home at 1638 Middle St.
The property was torn down at the request of borough officials.
With summer starting, the site needs to be maintained, Councilman Lou DeLuca said. He already has received one complaint.
“The weeds are getting high,” DeLuca said.
The borough is working to try and get someone to take over the property. Until that happens however, borough crews will clean up the site.
DeLuca said that is not normal procedure, but it is better than the alternative.
“This will build from grass to rodents, and then we'll have the board of health involved,” DeLuca said.
Because borough officials had the house torn down, Council President Renee Procopio said, she doesn't think they have a choice when it comes to maintaining the property.
“I think we have to,” Procopio said.
The code-enforcement department also is monitoring sites on Main and Church streets, DeLuca said. Issues with those sites include clutter, debris and occupancy.
He said he is working on a clarification on the ordinances for clutter and occupancy for better enforcement.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.