Aspinwall planning commission hears townhouse proposal
A townhouse plan is the latest proposal for a two-acre piece of land off Center Avenue in Aspinwall.
Initial plans for Overlook Court, a 14-unit development, were presented to the borough planning commission last week.
Members of the planning commission did not make a recommendation as more detailed plans will be prepared.
The site has been the location for previous proposals that failed.
Developer Karl Smith previously attempted to build complexes at the site. Those plans featured more units and led to a lawsuit against the borough.
Bob Stern of Center Avenue Development, the owner of the property who was not involved in the previous proposals, is confident the current proposal is possible.
“This should work,” Stern said.
Steve Victor of Victor-Wetzel Associates, the architect for the project, said multiple styles of townhomes would be offered to appeal to a variety of prospective residents.
“The opportunity here is to draw really two different lifestyles,” Victor said.
Access to the site would be through a private road. A sprinkler system would be installed for fire protection.
A formal application will be presented before the project can move forward. Stern has said he hopes to start work next year. He said he doesn't want cause any issues with existing homes in the area.
He said that the proposal fits in well with the community.
“It's not low-rent housing,” Stern said. “Hopefully it won't create the buzz it did in the past.”
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.