Permit process delays O'Hara sewer project
A $3.3 million sewer project in O'Hara is stalled due to a longer-than-expected permitting process.
The work, planned for three years, is designed to provide Saxonburg Boulevard area residents with reliable sewerage, to replace failing septic systems.
“We're still trying to work through Alcosan approvals,” said township Manager Julie Jakubec. “It's a very lengthy process.”
Once the Allegheny County Sanitary Authority grants approval, the state Department of Environmental Protection will review the project.
Jakubek expected work to start this year, but said that will not happen despite prep work being completed.
Some aspects are moving forward. Jakubec said the township applied for a $600,000 grant from the Allegheny County Gaming Economic Development Fund.
More than $3.4 million is available each year for projects that promote economic activity and have other benefits. Money would be made available through the Redevelopment Authority of Allegheny County.
“We're always trying for grants,” Jakubec said. “These kind are highly competitive.”
Money would help pay for installation of sewerage lines in the Saxonburg Boulevard area.
The project includes replacing three pump stations with one new one. The three current stations have posed constant maintenance troubles, township Engineer Chuck Steinert said. Residents in the area will be required to connect their homes to the new sewer line. New homes built on vacant land in the area also would be required to use the line, Steinert said.
Homeowners will be expected to bear some of the cost, but the amount has not been determined.
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.