Sharpsburg tweaking rental rules
Sharpsburg council will vote on proposed changes to its rental ordinance later this month.
The changes include requiring rental units to be inspected once every two years instead of once a year. Units can be inspected more than once in that time frame if occupancy changes, a fire occurs or problems arise.
Councilwoman Karen Pastor referenced an already-existing ordinance that requires landlords to evict tenants, if legally allowed, after police are called to a property three times with citations or charges filed.
She asked if it was possible to prevent landlords from moving tenants who are close to the required eviction point to another place in the borough.
Solicitor Mike Witherel said those regulations could not be placed in the rental ordinance.
“We can handle it in one spot, but we can't ban someone from Sharpsburg,” Witherel said.
The ordinance sets the cost of inspections at $60 for the two-year cycle.
The current cost is $50 per year. It also proposes a variety of fees if appointments are missed.
Councilman Lou DeLuca said after the meeting that those fees would be discussed before a vote is taken.
DeLuca, who has worked on the proposal for several months, said he is satisfied and hopes officials will approve it for advertising.
“I don't know what the outcome will be but I think it should be favorable,” DeLuca said.
Officials plan to vote to advertise the proposal at the next meeting at 6:30 p.m. July 18 at the borough building on Main Street.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.