St. Scholastica in Aspinwall youth group members harvest corn to help food bank
Youth group members from St. Scholastica in Aspinwall participated in a corn harvest to pick food to be given to the Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank.
It's one thing to empty the pantry and donate food to the hungry.
It's another to roll up your sleeves for a day's work to put food on the table.
“I always did appreciate the farmers but now I have a whole new admiration for the work they do,” said Jesse Dillon, 16, of Indiana Township.
Dillon was one of seven members of the St. Scholastica youth group from Aspinwall to hit the fields for a corn harvest last week.
The work netted five bins of veggies for the Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank.
The Duquesne-based food bank doles out more than 27 million pounds of food each year to Allegheny County residents and those in 10 surrounding counties. In an average month, the food bank distributes items to 60,116 people in Allegheny County.
St. Scholastic Youth Minister Jamie Dillon said she learned about the corn-picking by registering as a volunteer on the food bank website. She figured the unique project might appeal to members of her youth group, who take part in many outreach activities.
Typically, activities include yard work for the elderly, visits and games with patients at Harmar Village and dog therapy at the veterans' hospital in O'Hara.
“This is different than anything we had done so far,” Dillon said. “We are called to feed the hungry and that is exactly what we did.”
Dillon and her crew hit the Greenaway Farm in West Newton, where they collected a bounty of five bins of corn to donate.
“It was a neat experience,” Jesse Dillon said. “It was good to get out and help the poor in a different way.”
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.