Aspinwall mulls ways to deal with stray cats
Aspinwall will take a “cat by cat” strategy to dealing with stray cats in the borough.
An incident occurred several weeks ago in which an elderly woman was feeding a cat and was later scratched causing the cat to be quarantined.
The incident cost the borough $275.
Though the borough has had an issue with cats in the past, that is not the case now, borough manager Melissa Lang said.
While researching possible animal control options, officials found that having specific coverage for cats could be costly.
Lang said the cost to hire Hoffman Kennels is $250 per month for dogs and then a separate rider to the contract, which is $45 per cat. Police would still have to catch and trap the cat.
The borough, according to officials, does not currently have a cat problem that would call for that financial investment. It also does not have an issue with stray dogs.
Lang said in most cases involving dogs, the police are able to return the pet to its owner.
People who feed stray cats are asked to stop.
“This is an extreme case,” Lang said.
Officials agreed to monitor the situation to determine if it eventually becomes more cost effective to have a specific contract for the problem. Lang said at the moment it appears Hoffman Kennels is the only option the borough has.
“We'll keep on top of that and do case-by-case basis,” Lang said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.