Aspinwall riverfront park makes progress, council could provide help
Planners of the Aspinwall Riverfront Park want to present information about the project to the borough in the coming weeks.
Councilman Kevin Gordon, who is a member of the park's board of directors, said organizers are making progress but will need more help as the project moves forward.
“There's a lot of things going on, and I think council is going to have to get more involved,” Gordon said.
Gordon cited the need to demolish buildings at the site and plans for a new park entrance at the intersection Brilliant Avenue and Freeport Road as areas where officials will have to get more involved.
He said a presentation and social event at the site could give council members, borough employees and business leaders a chance to hear about the project.
Though many aspects of the park are still being finalized, it would give people a chance to see what it could look like, Gordon said.
“There's too many what-ifs right now, but at least you can see the direction they're leaning,” Gordon said.
That gathering could give the borough an idea of what sort of commitment it will need to make in the future as the park grows.
“There are going to be long-term responsibilities the borough is going to have that are going to financially impact us,” borough manager Melissa Lang said.
The work completed at the park so far has been impressive, Gordon said. Now, borough officials need to look forward at how the project will grow.
“They're making a lot of progress; it's time for us to get reacquainted,” Gordon said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.