Sharpsburg continues battle against blight
Sharpsburg leaders continue dealing with blighted properties and code violations, a councilman told borough officials.
The borough is keeping detailed records of complaints on properties. A chart in the borough office outlines progress on individual complaints, councilman Lou DeLuca said.
The complainant is then notified when the problem has been solved.
“There's constant communication on both parties,” DeLuca said.
DeLuca said contacting the owners of four blighted properties has been difficult.
“I make telephone calls, the bank no longer exists,” DeLuca said.
Solicitor Mike Witherel said researching the properties online can come up with information that can be helpful. “It's amazing what you can find out,” Witherel said.
DeLuca also asked about concerns from some residents near blighted properties where utilities still appear to be turned on.
Witherel suggested contacting Duquesne Light to have the electricity disconnected.
Witherel also told council members the borough can continue pursuing citations even if the property is involved in bankruptcy or foreclosure.
“Being in bankruptcy doesn't protect you from criminal liability,” Witherel said.
DeLuca said he would review the properties in question with Witherel to make sure the borough follows the correct procedures.
“I want to make sure we do this legally,” DeLuca said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.