Aspinwall riverfront park plans move forward
Organizers for the proposed Aspinwall Riverfront Park will provide more information to the borough before a land development application comes up for a vote.
Council was scheduled to vote on an application for the part of the park known as “west park” last night, Wednesday. That meeting ended past this newspaper's deadline.
The west park area is about three acres and is considered the more natural part of the park.
Though the borough planning commission approved the application unanimously late last month, Nick Scheid, a commissioner, said he had concerns. He said he worries that proposed parking at the park is inadequate.
“The planning commission is not against the park. The planning commission wants parking addressed and not verbally, physically,” Scheid said.
Susan Crookston, who led efforts to develop the park, said parking is included in the park's master plan. A total 36 spots are proposed for the west park.
That number could grow if a plan to change the entrance to the park off Freeport Road is approved. That also does not include parking that already exists for boaters who use the nearby marina who would continue to use that space.
“That is not space for the general public,” Crookston said.
Scheid, however, said parking will be tight in the area once the former PNC Bank building has a new tenant and the Fifth Third Bank on Freeport Road opens. He said he believes there is enough land at the park to have enough parking but more details should be presented.
“We don't want the park to go through and not have parking,” Scheid said.
Crookston and the team working on the park will submit information on the site to the borough before council takes a vote on the application.
She said this type of project is not one Aspinwall has seen before and she said she wants it to succeed.
“This is new and we all have to work together if we're going to have this project work,” Crookston said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.