Demolition permit for Aspinwall house requested
Aspinwall has received a demolition permit request for a house at 37 Western Ave.
The site was the subject of discussion last year when officials learned about plans to eventually demolish the site. A pocket of gas under the site raised concerns and council asked to be told when the demolition would occur.
Borough Manager Melissa Lang said the environmental committee will meet with the property owners before any demolition takes place.
She said precautions would have to be taken to make sure a sinkhole doesn't form when work takes place.
The owners have not identified plans for the site.
Plans for a parking lot have been rumored, and if that is the case the owners would have to work with the borough to secure approval, council President Mark Ellermeyer said.
“If they do intend a parking lot, that's going to give us a lot of leverage,” Ellermeyer said.
Councilman Joe Giuffre said he is concerned about the space becoming a way for people to access Route 28. He said he'd like to look into whether that can be prevented.
“Otherwise, I can see people cutting in there to get to 28,” Giuffre said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.