ShareThis Page

Townhouse, duplex plan in Aspinwall set for council vote

| Wednesday, Oct. 16, 2013, 9:01 p.m.

Aspinwall officials are expected to vote next month on a 12-unit housing plan off of Center Avenue.

Overlook Court would be a mix of townhouses and duplexes accessed by a private road that shares the name of the complex.

The plan already has been given preliminary approval by the borough's planning commission.

Access to the plan would be from Center Avenue. Townhouses would be on the high side of the two-acre property. Duplexes would be on the other side.

Sizes for units would vary.

Steve Victor of architectural firm Victor-Wetzel Associates said the units would appeal to a variety of potential residents including empty nesters and people looking for a traditional townhouse.

The site doesn't have any existing utilities, and new sewer lines and fire hydrants would have to be installed on the property.

“Other than what's along Center Avenue, there's no infrastructure on the site,” Victor said.

Victor said Center Avenue Development, the developer of the property, will seek approval next month.

Several other developments have been planned for the site in the past. Those plans featured more units on the site.

Bob Stern of Center Avenue Development said the larger units in Overlook Court would have office space, and each would have a two car garage.

“They're going to be upscale units,” Stern said.

Stern has said he hopes to begin work on the development next year.

Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.