Permit parking considered for Aspinwall business owners
Aspinwall officials will consider whether business owners should be able to apply for permit parking in the borough.
Sam Sieber, owner of Tavern in the Wall on Commercial Avenue, said he'd like business owners to be allowed to have permit parking, similar to what is available for residents. Businesses pay taxes just as residents do, and they bring consumers to the borough, he said.
“I'm not asking for (permits for) every one of my employees, but one would be nice,” Sieber said.
Sieber said space is limited for deliveries, and having permits would be convenient for himself and others. There would be room during the day in some areas where residents with permits park, while those people are at work, he said.
“If they have one or two permits, during the day when most of us are doing business, one of those people are going to be gone,” Sieber said.
Officials said they would discuss possibilities for business parking.
Parking also has been a topic of discussion at meetings of Allegheny Together, a county-run economic development program that Aspinwall joined last year.
“It's definitely come up,” Council President Mark Ellermeyer said.
Sieber said he could return to council next month for an update on his request. Borough manager Melissa Lang said a committee will look at options.
“We'll get a small committee together to talk about alternatives,” Lang said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.