Budget session set in Indiana Township
Indiana Township supervisors will hold a meeting Nov. 6 to discuss next year's budget and how to distribute revenue from the emergency-services tax.
The work session is scheduled for 7 p.m. at the town hall, 3710 Saxonburg Blvd. About $237,000 is expected to be collected for the fire fund through the emergency-services tax this year.
Already the three volunteer departments — Middle Road, Dorseyville and Rural Ridge — have received roughly half of the projected funds.
In the first part of the year, the three departments divided $120,000 evenly.
This summer, Indiana Township Volunteer Fire Association officials came to a township meeting to discuss a second distribution. The township wanted to keep the second distribution to put into a capital equipment fund — still earmarked for fire departments' uses — but added to each year to create a larger fund.
After discussing the options, township officials agreed to disburse remaining 2013 fire money among the three departments. Before dividing the money, officials budgeted paying from the fire tax certain related bills, such as worker's compensation and other insurance for the volunteer departments.
“The leadership needs to sit down and come to an agreement about where we are and move on to distribution,” township manager Daniel Anderson said.
Township Supervisor Paul Jorgensen said he wants to decide “what spending is going into the next year's budget and start from the same point.”
Volunteer Fire Association President John Balish agreed they need to finalize “what items are taken out on a consistent basis and how that will be handled.”
Sharon Drake is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.