Sharpsburg considers tax abatement
Sharpsburg officials are looking at a tax-abatement ordinance in Ben Avon as they consider a program of their own.
Council will forward the ordinance from Ben Avon to the borough solicitor for review and could use that community's policy to model its own.
Councilman Lou DeLuca said the abatement would encourage the cleanup of blighted properties in the borough.
“This would be a way to get, I suspect, some of our dilapidated properties rehabilitated,” DeLuca said.
Though the Ben Avon ordinance is only for a specific property, the Sharpsburg one would be boroughwide for properties that met a certain criteria.
“We don't want it street specific,” DeLuca said. “We want it to be a townwide ordinance.”
Councilman Matthew Rudzki said a tax abatement could encourage more people to do business in the borough.
“We need to find a way to spur development and growth in the community,” Rudzki said.
The abatement ordinance would cover only borough taxes.
Councilman Tony Sacco said the school board also would benefit if it decided to also offer a tax abatement.
“To get this property back on the tax rolls, it could definitely be an advantage to the school board and the county,” Sacco said.
While the school board could act separately in the future, that shouldn't stop the borough from taking action, Rudzki said.
“We shouldn't let the county and the school district interfere with what we're trying to do,” Rudzki said.
Though the Ben Avon ordinance has a 100-percent abatement the first year and then decreases by 10 percentage points for 10 years, that schedule could change to a shorter time frame for Sharpsburg.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.