High costs put Blawnox signs on hold
Blawnox officials will have to wait before they can have gateway signs installed at both ends of the borough.
Bids for the project came in about double what was expected.
The lowest bid was for $45,370. Officials expected the project to cost between $20,000 and $25,000.
Those numbers will mean that the project will have to wait, borough manager Sherry Kordas said.
“We have to look around for some additional funding sources,” Kordas said. “It is what it is.”
Borough engineer Gordon Taylor of Senate Engineering, said it is possible the bids could hold while more funding is sought but the lowest bidder, Pampena Construction, would have to agree.
The borough has 90 days to accept or reject the offer if no extension is granted. Three other offers were received for the project.
The signs would be on Freeport Road at both ends of the borough.
Officials have been working with the Penn State Center on designs for the project, which were approved last year.
The project has been in the works for several years.
Council President Deborah Laskey said plans would have to be tabled until more money became available.
“We can see what kind of funding is available for us later on,” Laskey said. “At least we have something to go by.”
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.