Money pours in to cover Blawnox field light project
A project Blawnox officials thought would be short of funds now has enough money and then some.
Replacement of lights at the ball field will cost $48,000, more than the borough had available for the project. However, funding from Duquesne Light and additional money from Allegheny County were received and the borough now has more money than needed for the project.
Duquesne Light will provide $10,000 in cash and $10,000 in services for the project and an additional $18,000 was secured from the county.
The project was intended to use Community Development Block Grant funding when it was first approved in August.
Borough engineer Gordon Taylor of Senate Engineering said the borough won't have to spend any of its own funds on the project.
“You really aren't going to spend a dime,” Taylor said.
The project began as a replacement of underground power lines but evolved into installation of a three phase electrical system, Taylor said.
That system was recommended by Duquesne Light for the ball field.
The project also will have room for future lights, something that likely will be needed.
“These are very aging and eventually will have to be replaced,” Taylor said about some of the lights and equipment that will remain at the park.
Safety concerns were a reason officials decided to approve the project two months ago despite still looking for funding sources.
Borough manager Sherry Kordas thanked Duquesne Light for their Power of Light grant program, which the borough applied to get extra funding.
“They were generous to help us with that, which is excellent,” Kordas said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.