Incumbents win in school board, Aspinwall elections
Fox Chapel Area School District
Incumbents Joel Weinstein and Chip Burke will retain their positions on the Fox Chapel Area School Board after beating newcomer Nancy Snider by about a 20 percent margin Tuesday night, according to unofficial results from the Allegheny County Department of Elections.
With 10 of 10 precincts counted, 17-year veteran Weinstein earned 1,091 votes; Burke, a two-term incumbent earned 1,058 votes; and Snider, a first-time candidate earned 869.
Incumbents Sherman Snyder and Robert Mauro were unopposed in races for Regions 1 and 2.
Snider, who retired from teaching after 40 years at Central Catholic, said she had hoped to win a school board seat to apply her education experience.
Both Burke and Weinstein said their goals are to maximize potential for all students.
Republicans Ann Marsico and Ann Pawlikowski will be new faces on Aspinwall Council next year.
With all three precincts reporting, Marsico and Pawlikowski received 395 and 364 votes, respectively.
Incumbents Joe Noro, a Republican, and Mark Ellermeyer, a Democrat, will retain their seats. Noro received 342 votes while Ellermeyer received 323.
Democrat Jay Arnone fell short in his bid for a council seat. He received 309 votes.
Republican Michael Schurko won a seat representing Indiana Township's fifth district.
He defeated Democrat David Allison by earning 109 votes to Allison's 95.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513 or email@example.com. Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.