Aspinwall Fountain Park improvement plan moves forward
Plans are finalized for the first phase of improvements to Fountain Park in Aspinwall.
Officials last week approved a proposal from the Aspinwall Neighborhood Watch to place new equipment at the park.
The borough has $5,000 budgeted for the project. The group will pay the difference.
The work is expected to cost about $10,600.
The Neighborhood Watch has raised money for several years for the project through events such as National Night Out.
Lorraine Marks, president of the group, said they have about $20,000 so far.
The cost of the proposal for the park could change, Marks said, but she doesn't expect the price to be significantly different.
Marks said the group envisions a three-phase improvement plan for the park.
The first phase will include equipment for younger children, including a swing set with a swing that is accessible to children with disabilities.
Equipment for older children will be part of future improvements.
Equipment for children between the ages of 2 to 5 is most needed, Marks said.
Marks said some funds will be used for general beautification in an effort to attract more people to the area.
“We want to have grasses and bulbs and make the park look a little more user friendly,” Marks said.
Marks said the hope is to have the first phase of improvements ready for work next year.
Borough manager Melissa Lang praised the work the Neighborhood Watch group has done with the park. She said she is confident the upgrades will be successful.
“From start to finish this project is going to be awesome,” Lang said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.