Share This Page

Fox Chapel Area students compete in book battle

| Wednesday, Dec. 11, 2013, 9:00 p.m.

This year's Battle of the Books included 64 teams of fourth- and fifth-graders.

The Fox Chapel Area students took to O'Hara Elementary's stage and parents and team sponsors filled the auditorium.

The elementary students from Hartwood, Fairview, Kerr and O'Hara signed up in September by choosing groups and getting the extracurricular work.

The youngsters earned their battle stripes by completing a 12-book reading list. The books included many genres.

“Who is Ben Franklin” was the biography chosen. “Aliens are Coming” was the nonfiction; it tells the story of Orson Welles' radio broadcast.

The elementary librarians chose a graphic novel this year, also.

Team sponsors wrote the questions used during the face off. Teams were awarded points for correct answers.

The group that supplied the most correct answers was the Ink Spots, The Sequel, a team from O'Hara Elementary consisting of Emma Shiner, Maddie Miske, Alexa Correnti, Vivian Shao and Alex Morton. This was the Ink Spots second year — hence “the Sequel.”

The annual scholastic contest goes back at least 18 years. It has become popular with 168 students from O'Hara, about 65 percent of the older classes, and similar percentages from the other three elementary schools participating.

Sharon Drake is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.