Aspinwall plans more research before moving ahead with signs
Aspinwall officials will study more firms before deciding how to proceed with plans to install new signs throughout the borough.
KMA Designs, a Carnegie-based firm, outlined its proposal for directional signs during a presentation this month. The signs would help direct people to sights in Aspinwall and the business district.
The idea for improved signage came from the borough's participation in Allegheny Together, an economic development program run through Allegheny County.
Borough Manager Melissa Lang said a more detailed list of costs was obtained from the firm. KMA Designs would charge a consulting fee of $23,864 for the five-phase project. The estimated cost for signs was $67,600.
Councilman Joe Noro said he wanted to wait until next year to vote on an agreement with the firm, so the borough could look at what other companies could do the work.
Lang said that is the best way for the borough to proceed. She said the committee that worked on the signs project would like to see if other firms could provide as much assistance as KMA Designs.
“That was one of the things we were most impressed by — that they were truly a start to finish company,” Lang said.
The borough's planning and zoning committee was not involved in recommending KMA Designs for the project. Council President Mark Ellermeyer said having a recommendation come through a borough committee could be helpful when it comes time to vote.
“Commonly, a lot of these proposals go through the various committees and council takes the recommendation of a committee to heart,” Ellermeyer said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.