Townhouse development in Aspinwall moves forward
A townhouse development in Aspinwall can move forward after officials approved a site plan with conditions last week.
The 12-unit Overlook Court from Center Avenue Developments LLC was approved with 16 conditions. A vote for the plan off of Center Avenue was delayed while developers waited for geotechnical reports and wall designs.
Those items are still outstanding. However, engineer Dan Martone said, a review of the site showed that the soils won't be a problem where construction will be.
“There's no big issues now,” Martone said.
Bob Stern, developer of the site, said he expected conditions to be placed on the plan.
“I would not expect any kind of approval without contingencies,” Stern said.
Martone said the plan still must go through several reviews before permits can be issued.
The plan comes with three waivers of borough requirements for roads. Those include width of the borough right of way, cartway width and horizontal curb radius. Martone said the size of the site is the reason for those requests.
“The reason it doesn't meet that is because the site is kind of tight and small,” Martone said.
Steve Victor of Victor-Wetzel Associates, the architect for the project, said those requests were made because the street planned for the development is private. He said the plans haven't changed and were reviewed by the planning commission, which recommended approval of the project.
“These modifications have been in there since the beginning with the planning commission,” Victor said.
The conditions include requiring the developers to resolve any issues at the site with the borough engineer.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.