Joint effort could bring shade trees to Blawnox, Etna, Sharpsburg
Three communities could team up to bring more trees into the region.
Sharpsburg, Blawnox and Etna are considering a multi-municipal shade tree commission.
The commission would enable the communities to receive more trees through grants and maintain consistency along the Allegheny River.
Sharpsburg borough Secretary Jan Barbus said all three communities have had problems getting enough people to form their own board. The joint board would need one person from each community.
Barbus said one person from Sharpsburg already has signed up and two more have expressed interest.
A multi-community board could jointly apply for grants, Barbus said. Aspinwall, which has its own shade tree commission, has received trees from TreeVitalize the last two years. Representatives from TreeVitalize met with members of the communities earlier this month.
Barbus noted that Sharpsburg already is working with Etna on a multi-municipal plan.
“This is a perfect segue into a shade tree commission,” Barbus said.
Though a commission initially wouldn't incur costs, it could in the future, Barbus said. The group eventually could need funding for advertising, training and equipment, similar to the borough's other boards and commissions.
Councilman Lou DeLuca said some members of the borough public works crew went through tree-tending courses when the borough previously looked into starting a commission on its own.
The borough also already has some of the equipment that would be needed to maintain trees.
“Our costs should be relatively minimal,” DeLuca said.
Sharpsburg passed its own resolution for the multi-municipal agreement. If the multi-community commission is finalized, ordinances for trees would be the same in each community.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.