Schurko takes Indiana Twp. seat
Indiana Township's annual reorganization meeting began with the swearing in of Supervisor Michael Schurko.
“I have an interest in the community and want to give back to the community,” said the new District 5 representative. District 5 covers the areas around Fairview Elementary and Fox Chapel Road.
Schurko, 64, who lives on Fox Chapel Road, is next-door neighbor to former supervisor George Dull.
“I want to continue some of the things George Dull did,” Schurko, a Republican, said.
Schurko said fiscal responsibility is a priority for the municipality. He joins four other Republicans on the board.
Budget interests are right up Schurko's alley.
He is “retired at the moment,” however, he most recently served as chief financial officer for LeWinter Moulding & Supply in Sharpsburg. In addition, he served as treasurer-at-large for O'Hara Township 30 years ago.
In other township news, Cecil Tranquill was reappointed to the planning commission, Michael Kotchey to the zoning and hearing board, Ken Berneberg as alternate to the zoning hearing board, and Michael Newland to the vacancy board.
Robert Newland was appointed to the parks and recreation commission, a position he held for a number of years, including serving as chairman before he took a term off.
Action was tabled for the open positions on the parks board and the Deer Creek Drainage Basin Authority.
Meetings for 2014 were reestablished for the second Tuesday of each month except November.
Sharon Drake is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.