Indiana Twp. officials mull option of raising property tax
Indiana Township officials might reopen the 2014 budget next month to raise the property tax rate — again.
A .02 mill increase might be needed, which would mean less than a $10 increase for the average property owner, due a reduction in the overall property value in the township, manager Daniel Anderson said.
Millage would still be lower than 2012's rate of 3.25.
Township officials last month approved the real estate rate at 2.95 mills, up from 2.71 mills for 2013.
They since learned that the township's property valuation was decreased by $4.5 million. The Medrad facility, located off Route 910, was devaluated by Allegheny County's Office of Property Assessments, which translates to less property tax.
Overall property values in the township are $622 million, compared to $639 million last year for taxing purposes, Anderson said. He is looking to reduce expenses before recommending another tax increase.
“This leaves us short if projections put us where we expect,” Anderson said.
The Medrad reduction was the second major hit to the township.
In 2013, Concordia of Fox Chapel, located on Route 910 Indiana, was taken off the tax rolls. It is associated with Concordia Lutheran Ministries, a nonprofit organization.
The Concordia reassessment and others were part of the reason why the 2014 budget included a tax increase.
Township residents pay about $408 in real estate taxes on the median value of property at $138,500, Anderson said.
Sharon Drake is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.