Fence fixed after keeping boulder off Route 28 near Sharpsburg
A 2-ton rock that slid last week along Route 28 in Sharpsburg has been cleared and the fencing replaced to protect motorists from future falls.
Crews from Allison Park Contractors worked around-the-clock for three days to remove the boulder, which was hanging against a fence over the shoulder of the Route 8 off-ramp, said PennDOT Spokesman Steve Cowan.
“There is really no way of knowing if additional rocks will fall, that's why it was important to get this work done as quickly as we could,” he said.
The rock slide occurred Jan. 16, with crews beginning work to clear it the following morning.
They removed fence panels that were mangled by the fall and then removed the rock and surrounding debris, which was extensive, Cowan said.
“They took 12 triaxles worth of rock out of that area,” he said.
Cowan did not have a cost estimate for the work.
Fencing was installed in the area three years ago. Cowan said this incident illustrated its effectiveness in preventing a disaster.
“It worked exactly as designed,” he said.
“But, because of the rock laying on the fence, it had limited capacity and we needed to get it back to 100 percent.”
Motorists were affected only minimally during the work.
The ramp remained open, with crews closing only the shoulder of the northbound Route 8 ramp. There was a partial lane shift but traffic was able to keep moving during the work, Cowan said.
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.