ShareThis Page

Former Fox Chapel superintendent to get $160K retirement package

| Wednesday, Feb. 12, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Former Fox Chapel Area School District Superintendent Anne Stephens, who left in December, six months ahead of schedule, will receive a retirement package worth more than $160,000.

Stephens served as leader of the district for eight years but left shy of the end of her contract, which was set to expire June 30.

She will receive $114,567 in severance pay and $37,500 in retention incentives, according to the terms of her contract.

Stephens also will receive $10,060 in accrued sick leave pay.

Payments were scheduled in four installments over three years.

Stephens already was paid about $88,000 of the total owed her — $37,500 in December 2013 and $51,000 last month.

She is expected to receive $52,000 in January 2015 and $21,627 in January 2016.

When she announced her retirement in June, school officials said it was unrelated to questions raised by some residents over her academic credentials, namely, the fact that her doctorate is from the now-defunct online school LaSalle University. State regulators shut down the university in 2001 after questioning whether it was a diploma mill. That angered some residents who questioned whether the degree warranted her $190,000 salary.

School board members stood by their decision to hire her and said at the time that they were pleased with Stephens' performance. Her career spanned 43 years in education, with 19 as a superintendent.

Last fall, the district conducted a nationwide search for Stephens' replacement. The board hired Lancaster resident Gene Freeman, 52, who currently serves as superintendent at Manheim Township School District. He will start working at Fox Chapel Area in March. Freeman earned his doctorate from Fayetteville State University in North Carolina.

Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.