Sharpsburg looks to add bite to sign regulations
Sharpsburg officials want to prevent the borough from turning into what one councilman describes as “the Las Vegas strip.”
Council plans to revisit an ordinance on signs in the borough. Regulations were drafted in 2000 but they were never adopted.
Borough secretary Jan Barbus said the only sign regulations are what is in the borough's zoning ordinance.
Councilman Anthony Sacco said the existing regulations don't help the borough much.
“There's no teeth ...,” Sacco said. “It just barks.”
Sacco agreed that it was a good idea to consider another set of regulations on signs.
Mayor Richard Panza agreed that it was best to start over instead of relying on rules updated in 2000.
“That has to be gone over,” Panza said. “There are new signs.”
Councilman Greg Domian said he didn't like the use of flashing signs that some businesses have added recently.
“It's starting to look like Las Vegas down on the lower end of town,” Domian said.
The ordinance also could address the use of tarp signs by businesses.
“The tarp signs, that's really tacky,” Domian said.
Sacco said while he agreed those signs looked “tacky,” there could be a limited place for those signs in the borough. If a business has a grand opening or special event, they could be permitted for a limited time.
“It's very tacky but it's a tool for a business,” Sacco said.
Solicitor Mike Witherel will review what ordinances exist before officials decide how to proceed.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.