Parkview VFD getting new engine to replace 1985 model
The Parkview Volunteer Fire Department in O'Hara will replace an engine that is nearly three decades old.
Chief Tom Fannie said a 2014 Pierce Contender on a Freightliner chassis is expected to roll into the fire hall along Midway Drive later this year.
It will replace a 1985 model on a Mack chassis.
O'Hara will foot the bill, expected to be about $371,000.
Township manager Julie Jakubec said council has a standing agreement with each of the municipality's fire departments to replace vehicles on a rotating schedule.
Parkview's second engine was purchased in 2003.
Jakubec said the township also pays for workers compensation and vehicle insurance.
Founded in 1930, Parkview has about 25 members and houses two engines and a squad truck. Parkview EMS runs three ambulances and a quick-response-service truck.
Fire volunteers last year responded to 99 calls.
With the life expectancy of a fire engine about 20 years, Fannie credited preventative maintenance checks for stretching tax dollars to the limit.
“The 1985 Mack had some work done to it about six years ago,” Fannie said.
Keeping up on small fixes each year minimizes long-term problems, he said.
A member of the department for 25 years, Fannie is eager to check out the updated safety measures such as the compressed-air foam system.
“It generates a foam that helps conserve water because you use less, and it creates a foam blanket to smother the fire,” he said.
The new engine will hold 50 gallons of Class A foam and 750 gallons of water, he said.
Fannie said the existing engine, despite its age, still is in good condition.
“It's in good shape with the exception of an open jump seat,” he said. “That exposes us to the elements.”
Tawnya Panizzi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-782-2121, ext. 2 or at email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.