Group promoting cooperation between Pittsburgh, neighboring towns wants to keep Aspinwall in loop
The Congress of Neighboring Communities wants to make sure Aspinwall is well represented in discussions of local issues.
Jim Price, policy and project manager with the organization, known as CONNECT, updated officials on the group's work. The organization works to promote cooperation between Pittsburgh and neighboring communities.
“We like to make sure you guys have a strong voice in anything that deals with a lot of the issues that are going to be common with the urban core,” Price said.
Among the issues the group is working on is transportation and communicating with new leadership at the Port Authority of Allegheny County.
“We want to make sure that as they're deciding what programs to go forward with, we want to make sure Aspinwall has a voice,” Price said.
Price said the group also has focused on efforts to clean up rivers and reduce blight.
The group also plans to look at ways to help its member communities with parking.
“We're looking at developing parking ordinances that will be more beneficial to residents but also allow for people to park for commuting if the municipality wants that to happen,” Price said.
Price said the group wants to continue working with borough officials to help them any way it can. Council President Joe Noro said the borough's membership has been beneficial.
“It's very good for our community,” Noro said.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.