Sharpsburg resident hopes to bring skate park to town
Efforts to develop a skate park in Sharpsburg could get help from the Allegheny River Towns Enterprise Zone, or ARTEZ.
Chris Lisowski of Sharpsburg, who has been active in trying to get a skate park in the borough, asked council members if the organization could help get grants and financial help to build the park.
He said having a nonprofit working with organizers would help the project.
“It's problematic for us because we don't have one,” he said.
Lisowski said the planning commission would like the skate park to be a short-term goal for the multimunicipal comprehensive plan officials of Sharpsburg, Etna and Millvale are working on.
“We feel it would be a greater catalyst to garner community support and benefit the well-being of the children and teenagers of the borough not only by providing them with a place to safely skateboard and bicycle but also giving a sense of ownership in our community,” Lisowski said.
Council will ask borough Solicitor Mike Witherel if there would be any conflict in having ARTEZ assist with fundraising for the skate park.
Councilman Matthew Rudzki said the organization serves a similar role with Etna as it develops its riverfront park area.
Lisowski said he also wants to hold skateboarding clinics in the area. He said they would be held each month and be free. The clinics would include demonstrations and provide tips for skateboarders.
The parking lot at the Sharpsburg Library is a possible location for some of the clinics before work begins on the library-expansion project.
Tom McGee is an associate editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 1513, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.